To read this content please select one of the options below:

Agronomic and consumer considerations for Bt and conventional sweet‐corn

D.A. Powell (Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Canada)
K. Blaine (Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Canada)
S. Morris (Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Canada and)
J. Wilson (Birkbank Farms, Orton, Canada)

British Food Journal

ISSN: 0007-070X

Article publication date: 1 November 2003

907

Abstract

In this farm‐to‐fork trial, genetically engineered (GE) Bt sweet‐corn and Bt potatoes were grown side‐by‐side with conventional varieties in the 2000 growing season at a farm and market in Hillsburgh, Ontario, Canada. The Bt sweet‐corn required no insecticides. From an economic perspective, only the first planting had pest pressure high enough to warrant the higher seed cost of the GE variety. The sweet‐corn harvested throughout the trial was segregated and labeled, and direct consumer evaluation of purchasing preferences was conducted. Overall, the Bt sweet‐corn outsold the conventional sweet‐corn by a margin of 680 dozen (or 8,160 cobs) to 452.5 dozen (or 5,430 cobs). A limited number of intercept interviews were conducted after consumers made their purchasing decision. The majority of consumers interviewed said they were more concerned about pesticides than genetic engineering; however, taste and quality also had a strong influence on purchasing decisions.

Keywords

Citation

Powell, D.A., Blaine, K., Morris, S. and Wilson, J. (2003), "Agronomic and consumer considerations for Bt and conventional sweet‐corn", British Food Journal, Vol. 105 No. 10, pp. 700-713. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700310506254

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2003, MCB UP Limited

Related articles