To read this content please select one of the options below:

A comparison of online and postal data collection methods in marketing research

Heath McDonald (Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia)
Stewart Adam (Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia)

Marketing Intelligence & Planning

ISSN: 0263-4503

Article publication date: 1 April 2003

20679

Abstract

The widespread acceptance of the use of online techniques in market research necessitates appreciation of the relative advantages and disadvantages of these techniques over more traditional research methods. This paper reports on a study which directly compares online and postal data collection methods using the same survey instrument on two samples drawn from the same population of football club subscribers. The results confirm that the online and postal respondents are demographically different. Online data collection is shown to be less expensive per respondent and that data collection is faster, however, an overall lower response level is achieved relative to the postal data collection method. Of greater importance, though, are the findings that respondents seem to answer questions differently online than they do via postal methods. The conclusion here is that online data collection should not be treated as a direct substitute for postal data collection in every instance.

Keywords

Citation

McDonald, H. and Adam, S. (2003), "A comparison of online and postal data collection methods in marketing research", Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500310465399

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2003, MCB UP Limited

Related articles