To read this content please select one of the options below:

An empirical analysis of lead benchmarking and performance measurement: Guidance for qualitative research

Karen Anderson (School of Business Organisation and Management, University of Ulster, Jordanstown Campus, Newtownabbey, UK)
Rodney McAdam (School of Business Organisation and Management, University of Ulster, Jordanstown Campus, Newtownabbey, UK)

International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management

ISSN: 0265-671X

Article publication date: 1 May 2005

4780

Abstract

Purpose

This aim of this paper is to explore the understanding and use of lead benchmarking and performance measurement as a possible means of achieving increased organisational change.

Design/methodology/approach

An empirical research methodology is used to survey 800 UK organisations, with 157 responses, in relation to their approach to lead benchmarking and performance measurement. A working definition of lead benchmarking and performance measurement is developed within the paper.

Findings

The findings indicate that new lead, forward looking, predictive benchmarks will need to be developed to support lead benchmarking and performance measurement activities. Furthermore, it was found that currently larger organisations are more likely to adopt these practices, with considerable variation across organisational sectors.

Originality/value

Focuses on ensuring that benchmarking and performance measurement remain at the leading edge of organisational change rather than becoming adhoc business improvement initiatives.

Keywords

Citation

Anderson, K. and McAdam, R. (2005), "An empirical analysis of lead benchmarking and performance measurement: Guidance for qualitative research", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 354-375. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710510591200

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles