When the evidence is not enough: Organizational factors that influence effective and successful library assessment
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to report on the findings of the two‐year Association of Research Libraries (ARL) sponsored project, “Making Library Assessment Work: Practical Approaches to Effective and Sustainable Assessment,”; it aims to examine the organizational factors that facilitate and impede effective data use and the implications for assessment in research libraries.
Design/methodology/approach
Information was gathered from a variety of sources, including: a self‐evaluation of assessment activities and needs done by each of the 24 participating libraries; extensive discussion with a designated contact at each library; a review of library and institutional sources such as annual reports, strategic plans, accreditation self‐studies, ARL and IPEDS statistics; and the observations and discussion that occurred during 1.5 day site visits.
Findings
The paper finds that libraries surveyed have made some progress incorporating data in decision making and services improvement, but there is much work to be done.
Originality/value
This is not an evidence‐based practice study but rather one that examines why evidence (the data on which a decision may be based) is not used more widely in libraries.
Keywords
Citation
Hiller, S., Kyrillidou, M. and Self, J. (2008), "When the evidence is not enough: Organizational factors that influence effective and successful library assessment", Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1108/14678040810928444
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2008, Emerald Group Publishing Limited