Emerald Login
   

Welcome guest

Article Request:
Data envelopment analysis for decision support

Article Information:

Title:

Data envelopment analysis for decision support

Author(s):

John Seydel

Journal:

Industrial Management & Data Systems

Year:

2006

Volume:

106

Issue:

1

Page:

81 - 95


ISSN:

0263-5577


DOI:

10.1108/02635570610641004

Publisher:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Document Access:

Existing customers:

Please login above.

Purchase this document:
Price payable: GBP £13.00
plus handling charge of GBP £1.50 and VAT where applicable.
Purchase

Request this document:
Print or e-mail a document request to your librarian.
Request

Reprints & permissions:
Image: Rightslink Request

Abstract:

Purpose – To provide decision makers (DMs) an option for addressing problems involving finite alternative sets and multiple criteria, where criterion weighting is difficult or impossible.

Design/methodology/approach – The multicriteria decision problem is described, and a typically descriptive (rather than prescriptive) tool, data envelopment analysis (DEA), is summarized, along with a hypothetical but typical example of a multicriteria decision (vendor selection). The DEA approach is modified to incorporate weight constraints and is used to rank the available vendors. Results are compared with those from the use of a popular multicriteria decision tool (SMART) and a naive averaging approach.

Findings – The modified DEA approach yields results very similar to those produced using SMART; these results are quite satisfactory in spite of the fact that DEA requires less involvement on the part of the DM. In addition, non-dominant optima (a possible anomaly with DEA) are avoided, and often a single alternative, rather than a non-dominated set, will result, thus providing a unique optimum.

Research limitations/implications – Results are based on the analysis of a single data set. Future investigation should examine the performance of the DEA approach when other data sets involving more like as well as more unlike alternatives are involved.

Practical implications – With DEA the burden on the DM is reduced, as the need for eliciting criterion weights is obviated. DEA should thus provide an acceptable alternative to prescriptive modeling tools when multiple DMs are involved and/or criterion weight determination is unfeasible.

Originality/value – This paper demonstrates how DEA, a tool used more typically in post hoc evaluations, can be used also, with some modifications, as a prescriptive decision support tool.

Keywords:

Data analysis, Decision making, Procurement, Supply chain management, Vendor rating


Article Type:

Research paper


Article URL:

http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/02635570610641004

Top