Welcome guest
Reporting drug errors in a British acute hospital trust
Gerry Armitage, Rob Newell, John Wright
Clinical Governance: An International Journal
2007
102 - 114
10.1108/14777270710741465
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Please select from the following options:
View HTML
|
View PDF
(202 KB)
Purpose – The purpose of this article is to examine a sample of paper-based incident reports concerning drug incidents to assess the utility of a reporting system.
Design/methodology/approach – A 50 per cent random sample of drug-related incident reports between 1999 and 2003 (
Findings – The paper finds that all definitive drug errors (
Research limitations/implications – Incident reports can be biased by psychological phenomena, and may not be representative of the parent organisation other than those who report. This study was carried out in a single health care organisation and generalisability may be questioned.
Practical implications – How health professionals interpret drug errors and their reporting could be improved. Reporting can be further developed by reference to taxonomies, but their validity should be considered. Incident report analysis can provide an insight into the competence of individual reporters and the organisation's approach to risk management.
Originality/value – This paper highlights the various data that can be captured from drug error reports but also their shortfalls which include: superficial content, incoherence; and according to professional group – varied reporting rates and an inclination to target individuals.
Drugs,
Hospitals,
Quality control,
Risk management,
United Kingdom
Research paper
www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/14777270710741465