Emerald Login
   

Welcome guest



Article Request:
School context and individual characteristics: what influences principal practice?


Article Information:

Title:

 School context and individual characteristics: what influences principal practice?

Author(s):

Ellen Goldring, Jason Huff, Henry May, Eric Camburn

Journal:

Journal of Educational Administration

Year:

2008 

Volume:

46 

Issue:

3 

Page:

332 - 352


DOI:

10.1108/09578230810869275

Publisher:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Document Access:

Please select from the following options:
View HTML | View PDF (261 KB)

Reprints & permissions:

Image: Rightslink Request

Abstract:

Purpose – As they operate in complex schools principals must allocate their attention to numerous responsibilities. This paper seeks to ask three questions: how do principals allocate their attention across major realms of responsibility; to what extent do principals in different contexts emphasize different realms of responsibility; and to what extent do individual attributes affect how principals allocate their attention across realms?

Design/methodology/approach – A cluster analysis is applied to data from a daily log of principal practices to identify principals who allocate their attention across major realms of responsibility in similar ways. With the three groups identified in the cluster analysis a discriminant analysis is then used to examine the individual attributes of the principals and the contexts within which these groups work to identify those individual characteristics and contextual conditions that best predict each principal's cluster membership.

Findings – The data from the log indicate that principals are not as fragmented across numerous realms of responsibility as previous research suggests. Some principals do spend considerable time on instructional leadership. The cluster analysis revealed three groups: “Eclectic” Leaders (their activities are distributed more evenly across different activities); Instructional Leaders (they focused most on Instructional Leadership); and Student Leaders (they emphasized student affairs). In the paper's discriminant analyses no individual attributes distinguished amongst the three types of principals; only contextual conditions predicted membership.

Research limitations/implications – The results point to the influence that context plays on school principals' practice; principals appear to prioritize and focus their actions under more challenging contextual conditions. The next step in the analysis is to determine how the leadership clusters and principal practices relate to important school outcomes.

Originality/value – The paper provides useful information on influences on school principals' practice.

Keywords:

Education, Individual behaviour, Leadership, Principals, Schools

Article Type:

Research paper

References:

50 references

Article URL:

www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/09578230810869275

Key Readings

Top