Article Information:
Author(s):
Simon Usherwood
Journal:
On the Horizon
Year:
2009
Volume:
17
Issue:
4
Page:
296 - 302
ISSN:
1074-8121
DOI:
10.1108/10748120910998353
Publisher:
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Acknowledgements:
This paper was originally presented at the 38th Annual Conference of SAGSET, Nottingham, 17-18 July 2008. The author wishes to thank David Jaques, Peter Trim, David Scott, Priya Johal and Karoline Nurzynska for their comments and discussion. This work was made possible by the award of a Fellowship of the Surrey Centre for Excellence in Professional Training and Education (www.surrey.ac.uk/sceptre) in 2007/2008.
Document Access:
Existing customers:
Please login above.
Purchase this document:
Price payable:
GBP £13.00
plus handling charge of GBP £1.50
and VAT where applicable.
Purchase
Request this document:
Print or e-mail a document request to your librarian.
Request
Reprints & permissions:
Request
Abstract:
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to address the issue of how best to reproduce realistic reproductions and outcomes in the dynamic environment of a simulated negotiation on a political theme.
Design/methodology/approach – Using a case study run by the author of a university undergraduate negotiation module, qualitative data are provided to support a pragmatic model of addressing issues of realistic behaviour and outcomes.
Findings – Through a combination of elements – notably, integration of more conventional academic research, use of repeated points of contact between students and the module leader, and extensive reflection after the exercise by the student – it is possible to provide for a simulation that more closely follows real-world outcomes than would otherwise be the case.
Research limitations/implications – The use of a single case study clearly limits the ability to generalise and implies the need to replicate the work in new iterations and in new contexts.
Practical implications – The paper highlights the importance of grounding simulations in reality, if they are to maximise their utility as a teaching practice. It also stresses the high level of engagement, not only on the part of the students, but also on the part of the module leader, who must be an active part of the simulation structure.
Originality/value – The consideration of a continuous process of grounding simulations in reality is one that has not been explored by the existing literature, so it offers useful insights into practice that will be of value to both practitioners and theorists in the field.
Keywords:
Higher education,
Negotiating,
Politics,
Simulation
Article Type:
Case study
Article URL:
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/10748120910998353
Top