Search
  Advanced Search
 
Chapter search
Book cover: Advances in International Marketing

Advances in International Marketing

ISSN: 1474-7979
Series editor(s): Professor Shaoming Zou

Subject Area: Marketing

Content: Series Volumes | icon: RSS Current Volume RSS

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Document request:
Using Formative Measures in International Marketing Models: A Cautionary Tale Using Consumer Animosity as an Example


Document Information:
Title:Using Formative Measures in International Marketing Models: A Cautionary Tale Using Consumer Animosity as an Example
Author(s):Adamantios Diamantopoulos, Petra Riefler
Volume:22 Editor(s): Marko Sarstedt, Manfred Schwaiger, Charles R. Taylor ISBN: 978-1-78052-094-0 eISBN: 978-1-78052-095-7
Citation:Adamantios Diamantopoulos, Petra Riefler (2011), Using Formative Measures in International Marketing Models: A Cautionary Tale Using Consumer Animosity as an Example, in Marko Sarstedt, Manfred Schwaiger, Charles R. Taylor (ed.) Measurement and Research Methods in International Marketing (Advances in International Marketing, Volume 22), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.11-30
DOI:10.1108/S1474-7979(2011)0000022004 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Article type:Chapter Item
Abstract:

Purpose – Despite the increasing use of formative measurement models in literature, little is known about potential consequences for substantive theory testing. Against this background, the aims of this chapter are (1) to highlight some problems that may arise when formative instead of reflective measures are used to test even simple theoretical models with covarianced-based methodologies, (2) to illustrate some approaches that might help overcome these problems, (3) to pinpoint potential interpretation difficulties of the results involving re-specified measurement models, and (4) to stimulate discussion on the implications for theory development when models are tested with formative measures.

Methodology/approach – Potential consequences of formative measurement models for theory testing are highlighted using an empirical study on consumer animosity as an illustrative example and applying covarianced-based structural equations modeling procedures for estimation purposes.

Findings – The empirical study shows (a) that some scaling options for the (composite) latent variable result in non-convergence problems, (b) that, assuming convergence, parameter estimates, standard errors, and significance levels vary depending on the scaling method used, and (c) that goodness-of-fit statistics cannot be used as diagnostic measures for the appropriateness of divergent results.

Originality/value of paper – The contribution of this chapter is two-fold: First, it shows that to enable estimation, it is often necessary to modify (i.e., expand) the original theoretical model in a conceptually reasonable manner and to do so before data collection. Second, it demonstrates that alternative scaling options for composite latent variables may result in inconsistent substantive conclusions. Consequently, the impact of formative measurement on theory testing is a critical topic and needs to receive further attention in future literature.


Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (387kb)
Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list


Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions