Advanced Search
Chapter search
Book cover: Studies in Symbolic Interaction

Studies in Symbolic Interaction

ISSN: 0163-2396
Series editor(s): Professor Norman Denzin

Subject Area: Sociology and Public Policy

Content: Series Volumes | icon: RSS Current Volume RSS

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Document request:
Symbolic Interactionism in Safety Communication in the Workplace

Document Information:
Title:Symbolic Interactionism in Safety Communication in the Workplace
Author(s):Christine Teague, David Leith, Lelia Green
Volume:40 Editor(s): Norman K. Denzin ISBN: 978-1-78190-782-5 eISBN: 978-1-78190-783-2
Citation:Christine Teague, David Leith, Lelia Green (2013), Symbolic Interactionism in Safety Communication in the Workplace, in Norman K. Denzin (ed.) 40th Anniversary of Studies in Symbolic Interaction (Studies in Symbolic Interaction, Volume 40), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.175-199
DOI:10.1108/S0163-2396(2013)0000040011 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Article type:Chapter Item

This chapter uses symbolic interactionism as a theoretical framework for considering data produced during two in-depth ethnographic investigations: one at Orco, a minerals processing facility; the other at RTE, the Rail Transport Executive of an urban region in Australia. It discusses the value of symbolic interactionism in revealing the detailed importance of interaction between managers and workers and, particularly, within specific workgroups. It argues that regular, repeated and intense interaction such as characterizes daily work in high-pressure occupations helps establish subcultures. It is then comparatively easy for a subculture group to develop its own values and meanings in opposition to those promulgated by management. The two case studies differ significantly around the organizational value placed on investigating injuries and accidents. In the Orco workplace, injury statistics are clearly communicated and workers believe that the “zero injury workplace” is a management priority. In the RTE, transit officer injuries are kept confidential and workers believe that a major purpose of investigations is to show how individual workers are at fault. In both cases, however, the work group has developed an informal safety culture at odds with that promoted by managers.

The conclusion drawn by the end of the chapter is that managers seeking to influence the safety cultures of workers in dangerous and fraught occupations should pay close attention to the ways in which those workers operate at a symbolic distance from management. They should engage with the workers to understand the symbolic value placed by frontline staff upon the meanings attributed to safe work practices, and should collaborate together to develop a shared safety culture in which workers are protected by active management engagement in their symbolic reality. Where this occurs, workers’ perspectives are appreciated at the same time as their practices become more regulated and aligned with managerial wishes. Symbolic interactionism offers a rich perspective that takes into account the dynamism of changing circumstances and that works outwards from the thought processes of individuals through to interactions across entire organizations.

Fulltext Options:



Existing customers: login
to access this document


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login



Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (179kb)

To purchase this item please login or register.


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian

Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions