Series editor(s): Professor Norman Denzin
Subject Area: Sociology and Public Policy
|Title:||Do Animals have Selves?|
|Volume:||40 Editor(s): Norman K. Denzin ISBN: 978-1-78190-782-5 eISBN: 978-1-78190-783-2|
|Citation:||Ryan Turner (2013), Do Animals have Selves?, in Norman K. Denzin (ed.) 40th Anniversary of Studies in Symbolic Interaction (Studies in Symbolic Interaction, Volume 40), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.425-460|
|DOI:||10.1108/S0163-2396(2013)0000040021 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
|Article type:||Chapter Item|
|Abstract:||This piece is a review of the animal selfhood literature in sociology, organized into four main parts. First, I review the sociological literature of human–animal interactions, in which sociologists claim that animals possess selves. Second, I review how sociologists have referred to the self, from which I construct five criteria of selfhood, including self as attribution, self-awareness, intersubjectivity, self-concept/reflexivity, and narration. Third, I address how animals have selves using these criteria, drawing on sociological and ethological evidence. Fourth, I critique the animal interaction sociologists’ specific claims of animal selfhood, including their epistemological failure to distinguish between human accounts of animal subjectivities and animal subjectivities, and their empirical failure to show how animals act toward themselves. Ultimately, I conclude that animal selves, particularly in an elemental Meadian sense, are potentially real, but in most cases are unobservable or unverifiable phenomena.|
Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (248kb)
Due to our platform migration, pay-per-view is temporarily unavailable.
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian