ISSN: 0278-0984
Series editor(s): Professor Michael Baye, Professor John Maxwell
Subject Area: Economics
Content: Series Volumes |
Current Volume RSS
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
| Title: | Gain and Loss Ultimatums |
|---|---|
| Author(s): | Nancy Buchan, Rachel Croson, Eric Johnson, George Wu |
| Volume: | 13 Editor(s): John Morgan ISBN: 978-0-76231-194-1 eISBN: 978-1-84950-337-2 |
| Citation: | Nancy Buchan, Rachel Croson, Eric Johnson, George Wu (2005), Gain and Loss Ultimatums, in John Morgan (ed.) Experimental and Behavioral Economics (Advances in Applied Microeconomics, Volume 13), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.1-23 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/S0278-0984(05)13001-6 (Permanent URL) |
| Publisher: | Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
| Article type: | Chapter Item |
| Abstract: | This chapter investigates the difference between ultimatum games over gains and over losses. Although previous research in decision making has found that individuals treat losses and gains differently, losses have not previously been investigated in strategic situations. In the field, however, the problem of negotiating over losses is as unavoidable and problematic as the problem of negotiating over gains. In addition, data on how we bargain over losses can shed some theoretical light on fairness preferences. Two experiments use within-subject designs, the first in the U.S. and the second in the U.S., China and Japan. We find that offers and demands are higher in losses than in gains, and that these results hold across the three countries. We adapt Bolton's (1991) model of fairness to explain the results. Specifically, we extend prospect theory's loss aversion to unfairness, suggesting that unfairness in losses looms larger than unfairness in gains. |
Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (194kb)
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian