Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest

Search for:


Browse:

Bannner: Aslib individual membership.
 
Chapter search
Book cover: Advances in Library Administration and Organization

Advances in Library Administration and Organization

ISSN: 0732-0671
Series editor(s): Delmus Williams, Janine Golden

Subject Area: Library and Information Studies

Content: Series Volumes | icon: RSS Current Volume RSS

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Document request:
AN EXAMINATION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES OF FEMALE COLLEGE STUDENTS WHO CHOOSE TRADITIONAL VERSUS NONTRADITIONAL ACADEMIC MAJORS


Document Information:
Title:AN EXAMINATION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES OF FEMALE COLLEGE STUDENTS WHO CHOOSE TRADITIONAL VERSUS NONTRADITIONAL ACADEMIC MAJORS
Author(s):Bambi N Burgard
Volume:20 ISBN: 978-0-76231-010-4 eISBN: 978-1-84950-206-1
Citation:Bambi N Burgard (2003), AN EXAMINATION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES OF FEMALE COLLEGE STUDENTS WHO CHOOSE TRADITIONAL VERSUS NONTRADITIONAL ACADEMIC MAJORS, in (ed.) 20 (Advances in Library Administration and Organization, Volume 20), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.165-202
DOI:10.1016/S0732-0671(02)20008-5 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Article type:Chapter Item
Extract:

In the last twenty years, the women’s movement has resulted in a greater representation of women in once male-dominated venues, such as the job force and higher education. Women currently represent nearly 43% of those in the United States labor market, and it is expected that four in every five women ages 25–54 will be employed by the year 2000 (Hoyt, 1988; U.S. Department of Labor, 1995). Despite women’s increasing participation in the world of work, they continue to choose occupations that represent the stereotypically feminine range of occupations, meaning less pay and less status (Betz & Fitzgerald, 1987). For example, women are still underrepresented in engineering, architecture, and the physical sciences (Eccles, 1994; U.S. Department of Labor Women’s Bureau, 1995). These gender-based occupational patterns are also evidenced in college enrollment; women continue to comprise the majority in academic majors that are considered traditionally feminine, such as early childhood, elementary, and secondary education, library science, nursing, and home economics, whereas men are the predominant majors in physics, chemistry, architecture, and engineering (Bartholomew & Schnorr, 1994; National Science Foundation, 1990).


Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (160kb)
Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list


Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright information  |  Site policies  |  Cookie information
..