CONSIDERATION OF LEGITIMACY PROCESSES IN TEASING OUT TWO PUZZLES IN THE STATUS LITERATURE

Cathryn Johnson

doi:10.1016/S0882-6145(03)20009-6

Login

Welcome:
Guest

Search for:

Browse:

Product Information:

Resources:

Advances in Group Processes

ISSN: 0882-6145
Series editor(s): S.R.Thye and Edward Lawler

Subject Area: Sociology and Public Policy

Content: Series Volumes | Current Volume RSS

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Document request:
CONSIDERATION OF LEGITIMACY PROCESSES IN TEASING OUT TWO PUZZLES IN THE STATUS LITERATURE

Document Information:
Title:	CONSIDERATION OF LEGITIMACY PROCESSES IN TEASING OUT TWO PUZZLES IN THE STATUS LITERATURE
Author(s):	Cathryn Johnson
Volume:	20 Editor(s): Shane R. Thye and John Skvoretz ISBN: 978-0-76231-030-2 eISBN: 978-1-84950-217-7
Citation:	Cathryn Johnson (2003), CONSIDERATION OF LEGITIMACY PROCESSES IN TEASING OUT TWO PUZZLES IN THE STATUS LITERATURE, in Shane R. Thye and John Skvoretz (ed.) Power and Status (Advances in Group Processes, Volume 20), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.251-284
DOI:	10.1016/S0882-6145(03)20009-6 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:	Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Article type:	Chapter Item
Abstract:	In this paper, I show how a consideration of legitimacy processes is of theoretical use in addressing two current issues in status research. First, I investigate under what conditions the contrast between the sex composition of a work group and the sex composition of an organization’s authority structure may trigger the salience of gender status in task groups. I argue that this contrast will make gender status salient when an evaluation from an authority figure outside the group creates inconsistency and uncertainty in the current status structure within the group. Delegitimation of a superior is one such process that produces this inconsistency and uncertainty. Second, I examine under what conditions status position compared to identity will more likely stimulate behavior among work group members. I argue that the legitimation of the superior and the group’s status order reduce the likelihood that group members will pursue status inconsistent, identity behaviors. Delegitimation, however, increases opportunities for acting in identity consistent ways and reduces the costs for doing so, thus enhancing the likelihood of identity-based behaviors.