Coffee, Revolution, and Democracy in Central America

Jeffery M. Paige

doi:10.1016/S1057-1922(05)10015-8

Login

Welcome:
Guest

Search for:

Browse:

Product Information:

Resources:

Research in Rural Sociology and Development

ISSN: 1057-1922
Series editor(s): Professor Terry Marsden

Subject Area: Sociology and Public Policy

Content: Series Volumes | Current Volume RSS

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Document request:
Coffee, Revolution, and Democracy in Central America

Document Information:
Title:	Coffee, Revolution, and Democracy in Central America
Author(s):	Jeffery M. Paige
Volume:	10 Editor(s): Paul S. Ciccantell, David A. Smith, Gay Seidman ISBN: 978-0-76231-162-0 eISBN: 978-1-84950-314-3
Citation:	Jeffery M. Paige (2005), Coffee, Revolution, and Democracy in Central America, in Paul S. Ciccantell, David A. Smith, Gay Seidman (ed.) Nature, Raw Materials, and Political Economy (Research in Rural Sociology and Development, Volume 10), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.333-352
DOI:	10.1016/S1057-1922(05)10015-8 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:	Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Article type:	Chapter Item
Abstract:	The chapter draws on historical evidence from Central America to test two of the most influential theories of the development of democracy: (1) structural theories derived from the work of Barrington Moore and (2) theories of the “political economy of democratic transitions.” The Central American evidence confirms Moore's theory in regard to the anti-democratic role of landed elites, but not the democratic role of the bourgeoisie. Contrary to some structural theories, the industrial working class was also not important in the development of democracy in Central America. Nor does the Central American evidence fit the political economy of democratic transitions model of negotiated or imposed “transitions from above.” A new model, termed the route to democracy through socialist revolution from below is proposed to account for the Central American evidence and the implications of the model are explored for the development of democracy generally.