The influence of attributions and budget emphasis on framing and risk preferences under conditions of unfavorable budget variances

David Ryan; Kristin Wentzel

doi:10.1016/S1474-7979(00)03029-5

Login

Welcome:
Guest

Search for:

Browse:

Product Information:

Resources:

Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research

ISSN: 1475-1488
Series editor(s): Donna Bobek Schmitt

Subject Area: Accounting and Finance

Content: Series Volumes | Current Volume RSS

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Document request:
The influence of attributions and budget emphasis on framing and risk preferences under conditions of unfavorable budget variances

Document Information:
Title:	The influence of attributions and budget emphasis on framing and risk preferences under conditions of unfavorable budget variances
Author(s):	David Ryan, Kristin Wentzel
Volume:	3 ISBN: 978-0-76230-668-8 eISBN: 978-1-84950-055-5
Citation:	David Ryan, Kristin Wentzel (2000), The influence of attributions and budget emphasis on framing and risk preferences under conditions of unfavorable budget variances, in (ed.) 3 (Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, Volume 3), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.133-152
DOI:	10.1016/S1474-7979(00)03029-5 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:	Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Article type:	Full length article
Abstract:	The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of causal attributions and budget emphasis on individuals' framing perceptions and risk preferences under conditions of unfavorable budget variances. Prospect theory maintains that risk preferences are domain-specific; individuals tend to be risk-averse in gains and risk-seeking in losses. Prior accounting research has found that while individual actions clearly reflect prospect theory propositions during situations of gain, individuals demonstrate risk indifference when faced with situations of loss. We investigate potential explanations for this lack of strict adherence to prospect theory during situations of loss. Our study uses internal and external attributions and pressure to meet budget targets for performance appraisals to create salient loss conditions. The results demonstrate that budget decisions vary depending on the casual factors of the unfavorable variance and on the degree of emphasis placed on achieving time budget targets. As expected, subjects exhibited relatively more risk seeking behavior when faced with internal attributions and when they expected a greater emphasis on meeting budgetary goals in performance assessment. Our results also demonstrate the importance of controlling for framing effects in prospect theory related tests.