Can We Talk? Communication Technologies, Social Informatics, and Systemic Change

Barbara Monroe

doi:10.1016/S1479-3660(05)08015-7

Login

Welcome:
Guest

Search for:

Browse:

Product Information:

Resources:

Advances in Educational Administration

ISSN: 1479-3660
Series editor(s): Anthony H. Normore, Ph.D.

Subject Area: Education

Content: Series Volumes | Current Volume RSS

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Document request:
Can We Talk? Communication Technologies, Social Informatics, and Systemic Change

Document Information:
Title:	Can We Talk? Communication Technologies, Social Informatics, and Systemic Change
Author(s):	Barbara Monroe
Volume:	8 Editor(s): Sharon Y. Tettegah, Richard C. Hunter ISBN: 978-0-76231-280-1 eISBN: 978-1-84950-393-8
Citation:	Barbara Monroe (2006), Can We Talk? Communication Technologies, Social Informatics, and Systemic Change, in Sharon Y. Tettegah, Richard C. Hunter (ed.) Technology and Education: Issues in Administration, Policy, and Applications in K12 Schools (Advances in Educational Administration, Volume 8), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.213-229
DOI:	10.1016/S1479-3660(05)08015-7 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:	Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Article type:	Chapter Item
Abstract:	Asynchronous communication technologies (ACT), such as email, listservs, and online discussions, have been slow to catch on in K-12 classrooms. Not coincidentally, these are potentially the most transformative of all technologies and the ones most difficult to integrate into a traditional classroom. Teacher training, technical support, and access do not really explain this glaring exclusion. The theoretical standpoint of social informatics– or the ecology of technology and social systems– gives us a productive way of understanding technology's impact– or lack thereof – in school settings. More specifically, the individual/organizational, institutional, national, and societal contexts impede or propel technological integration in any given setting. In light of these contexts, one teacher's successful integration practices are examined. While teachers can effect change in their own classrooms, only administrators can truly effect systemic change, ironically working from the grass-roots up, as one district success story illustrates.