Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest

Search for:


Browse:

Bannner: Aslib individual membership.
 
Chapter search
Book cover: Research in Ethical Issues in Organizations

Research in Ethical Issues in Organizations

ISSN: 1529-2096
Series editor(s): Michael Schwartz and Howard Harris

Subject Area: Business Ethics and Law

Content: Series Volumes | icon: RSS Current Volume RSS

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Icon: .

Document request:
Are Professionals Mythical Heroes?”


Document Information:
Title:Are Professionals Mythical Heroes?”
Author(s):Michel Dion
Volume:6 Editor(s): Moses L. Pava, Patrick Primeaux ISBN: 978-0-76231-261-0 eISBN: 978-1-84950-378-5
Citation:Michel Dion (2005), Are Professionals Mythical Heroes?”, in Moses L. Pava, Patrick Primeaux (ed.) Crisis and Opportunity in the Professions (Research in Ethical Issues in Organizations, Volume 6), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.221-235
DOI:10.1016/S1529-2096(05)06013-X (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Article type:Chapter Item
Extract:

Western societies are not “a-moralized.” We could observe “ethical etiquette” everywhere, in every social institution and concerning every human activity or field of research (codes of ethics, ethics committees, Government ethics laws and so forth). The moralization processes of Western societies appear to be actualized in a dialectical way, and that process involves three patterns of actions undertaken by most of the social groups and institutions: (1) to get rid of an external (heteronomous) morality; (2) to adopt an inner (autonomous) morality; and (3) to safeguard two equivocal attitudes: (a) excluding any moral issue from one's decision-making and paradigmatic beliefs individuals adhere to (in order to explain the systemic reality of their self, world and Nature); and (b) letting to the given social groups and institutions (professions, for instance) the responsibility to provide the moral foundations of social life. In neo-liberalistic societies, where individualism has reached its peak, moral responsibility is more and more considered as a constraint to the “desire to do what we wish to do.” Indeed, such a desire serves to define the meaning of freedom in neo-liberalistic societies, although the meaning expresses a distorted form of freedom: to do whatever we like, except if it tends to reduce others’ freedom. Such a meaning does not imply to serve society or to love each other.


Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (119kb)
Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list


Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright information  |  Site policies  |  Cookie information
..