To read this content please select one of the options below:

How a general and a specific thesaurus cover expressions in patients' questions and physicians' answers

Johanna Eerola (National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland)
Pertti Vakkari (Department of Information Studies, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland)

Journal of Documentation

ISSN: 0022-0418

Article publication date: 18 January 2008

676

Abstract

Purpose

This paper sets out to examine the degree to which General Finnish Thesaurus (GFT) and FinMeSH cover various semantic expressions of medical concepts in patients' questions and physicians' answers concerning cardiovascular diseases. The former represents lay persons' information needs.

Design/methodology/approach

A total of 50 question‐answer pairs were collected in a medical web site. Concepts and their expressions (terms) with their semantic relations were identified in questions and answers.

Findings

FinMeSH covered 65 per cent and GFT 41 per cent of all medical terms in texts. The expressions of patients and physicians matched better with FinMeSH than GFT regardless of the type of expression. The difference in favour of FinMeSH was typically about 25 per cent‐units.

Originality/value

The low fit with users' vocabularies makes GFT a poor tool for supporting searching, whereas the relatively high fit of FinMeSH suggests that it is a reasonable tool in assisting searching. Conclusions concerning the bridging of these two thesauri are discussed.

Keywords

Citation

Eerola, J. and Vakkari, P. (2008), "How a general and a specific thesaurus cover expressions in patients' questions and physicians' answers", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 64 No. 1, pp. 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844187

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2008, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles