To read this content please select one of the options below:

Optimizing time–cost in generalized construction projects using multiple-objective social group optimization and multi-criteria decision-making methods

Duc Hoc Tran (Department of Construction Engineering and Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam) (Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

ISSN: 0969-9988

Article publication date: 17 April 2020

Issue publication date: 8 October 2020

447

Abstract

Purpose

Project managers work to ensure successful project completion within the shortest period and at the lowest cost. One of the main tasks of a project manager in the planning phase is to generate the project time–cost curve, and furthermore, to determine the most appropriate schedule for the construction process. Numerous existing time–cost tradeoff analysis models have focused on solving a simple project representation without regarding for typical activity and project characteristics. This study aims to present a novel approach called “multiple-objective social group optimization” (MOSGO) for optimizing time–cost decisions in generalized construction projects.

Design/methodology/approach

In this paper, a novel MOGSO to mimic the time–cost tradeoff problem in generalized construction projects is proposed. The MOSGO has slightly modified the mechanism operation from the original algorithm to be a free-parameter algorithm and to enhance the exploring and exploiting balance in an optimization algorithm. The evidential reasoning technique is used to rank the global optimal obtained non-dominated solutions to help decision makers reach a single compromise solution.

Findings

Two case studies of real construction projects were investigated and the performance of MOSGO was compared to those of widely considered multiple-objective evolutionary algorithms. The comparison results indicated that the MOSGO approach is a powerful, efficient and effective tool in finding the time–cost curve. In addition, the multi-criteria decision-making approaches were applied to identify the best schedule for project implementation.

Research limitations/implications

Accordingly, the first major practical contribution of the present research is that it provides a tool for handling real-world construction projects by considering all types of construction project. The second important implication of this study derives from research finding on the hybridization multiple-objective and multi-criteria techniques to help project managers in facilitating the time–cost tradeoff (TCT) problems easily. The third implication stems from the wide-range application of the proposed model TCT.

Practical implications

The model can be used in early stages of the construction process to help project managers in selecting an appropriate plan for whole project lifecycle.

Social implications

The proposal model can be applied to multi-objective contexts in diversified fields. Moreover, the model is also a useful reference for future research.

Originality/value

This paper makes contributions to extant literature by: introducing a method for making TCT models applicable to actual projects by considering general activity precedence relations; developing a novel MOSGO algorithm to solving TCT problems in multi-objective context by a single simulation; and facilitating the TCT problems to project managers by using multi-criteria decision-making approaches.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by the Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant number 102.05‐2018.07. We acknowledge the support of time and facilities from Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), VNU‐HCM for this study.

Citation

Tran, D.H. (2020), "Optimizing time–cost in generalized construction projects using multiple-objective social group optimization and multi-criteria decision-making methods", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 27 No. 9, pp. 2287-2313. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2019-0412

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles