To read this content please select one of the options below:

Parents' responses to toys representing physical impairment

Sian Jones (Division of Psychology, Sociology and Education, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK)
Leanne Ali (Division of Psychology, Sociology and Education, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK)
Mohona Bhuyan (Division of Psychology, Sociology and Education, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK)
Laura Dalnoki (Division of Psychology, Sociology and Education, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK)
Alicia Kaliff (Division of Psychology, Sociology and Education, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK)
William Muir (Division of Psychology, Sociology and Education, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK)
Kiia Uusitalo (Division of Psychology, Sociology and Education, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK)
Clare Uytman (Division of Psychology, Sociology and Education, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK)

Equality, Diversity and Inclusion

ISSN: 2040-7149

Article publication date: 26 June 2020

Issue publication date: 12 November 2020

728

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to look at parents' perceptions of a number of different toy prototypes that represented physical impairments and predictors of these perceptions.

Design/methodology/approach

A correlational survey design was used. Parents of children aged 4–10 years who identified their child as having a disability (n = 160) and not as having a disability (n = 166) took part. They rated a number of prototypes for likelihood that their child would enjoy playing with them and completed measures of their responses toward children with disabilities and of their own and their child's direct contact with people with disabilities.

Findings

It was found that, among parents of children who did not declare that their child had a disability, the more open the parents were toward disability, the more contact the children had with other children with disabilities and the more likely they were to consider that their child would like to play with a toy prototype representing a physical impairment. This pattern of results was not found among parents who identified their child as having a disability, where instead positive friendship intentions of parents mediated this association.

Research limitations/implications

These findings have implications for theories informing the positive benefits of disability representation.

Practical implications

These findings indicate different paths through which parents might be moved to purchase toys that represent physical impairments for their children.

Social implications

These findings suggest that representative toys might be associated with an open dialogue around the topic of disability.

Originality/value

This is the first study of the responses of parents to toys that represent physical impairments known to the authors.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Caralyn Blaisdell for her helpful comments on a draft of thesis manuscript and all the parents who took part in their research.

Citation

Jones, S., Ali, L., Bhuyan, M., Dalnoki, L., Kaliff, A., Muir, W., Uusitalo, K. and Uytman, C. (2020), "Parents' responses to toys representing physical impairment", Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, Vol. 39 No. 8, pp. 949-966. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-08-2019-0213

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles