To read this content please select one of the options below:

Rules versus relationships and campus sexual misconduct

Brian Pappas (Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, Michigan, USA)

International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior

ISSN: 1093-4537

Article publication date: 9 September 2019

91

Abstract

Purpose

How do university compliance administrators implement the rules prohibiting campus sexual misconduct? Title IX Coordinators’ authority is legal–rational and derives from the power to enforce Title IX and university rules. The paper aims to discuss this issue.

Design/methodology/approach

Analyzing narratives collected from administrators at 22 large institutions of higher education, this paper distinguishes rules from relationship-oriented Coordinators and develops an understanding of how and why Title IX Coordinators utilize relational authority as they implement Title IX.

Findings

The key finding is that relational administrators exhibit less institutional authority than their rules-based counterparts and focus on their relationships with complainants and respondents over university leaders and administrators.

Originality/value

While other researchers have focused on rules, this research demonstrates how Title IX Coordinators draw heavily on relational strategies.

Keywords

Citation

Pappas, B. (2019), "Rules versus relationships and campus sexual misconduct", International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 226-241. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-09-2018-0100

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles