Development of menu board media for information on sugar, salt and fat related health messages at a senior high school cafeteria in Depok City, Indonesia

Rita Ramayulis (Department of Nutritional, Health Polytechnic, Jakarta II Health Ministry, Jakarta, Indonesia)
Anhari Achadi (Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia)

Journal of Health Research

ISSN: 2586-940X

Article publication date: 10 July 2018

Issue publication date: 3 August 2018

746

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to produce informative menu board media to show sugar, salt and fat (SSF) related health messages in a Senior High School canteen.

Design/methodology/approach

The research model included stages of needs analysis, design, product development and product evaluation. The data were collected from material experts, media experts and 186 high school students. Data were analyzed by descriptive qualitative and statistical analysis.

Findings

The C and D menu boards were selected for their content information and health messages that received higher scores.

Originality/value

There are four stages required in the development of menu board media: needs analysis, menu board design, product development and product evaluation. Further research would be needed to develop the menu boards into a simpler model.

Keywords

Citation

Ramayulis, R. and Achadi, A. (2018), "Development of menu board media for information on sugar, salt and fat related health messages at a senior high school cafeteria in Depok City, Indonesia", Journal of Health Research, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 307-312. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHR-05-2018-036

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Rita Ramayulis and Anhari Achadi

License

Published in the Journal of Health Research. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode


Background

Indonesia is experiencing a dramatic escalation of non-contagious diseases (NCDs). Basic Health Research Results from 2007 to 2013 show a significant increase in NCDs, including which, stroke cases increased from 8.3 per mile in 2007 to 12.1 per mile in 2013. Furthermore, 61 percent of total deaths are caused by NCDS with cardiovascular disease as the highest cause of death by 37 percent[1]. The main causes of NCDS can be grouped into modifiable factors, such as environmental and behavioral factors and non-modifiable risk factors, including poor diet high in sugar, salt and fat (SSF)[2].

In an effort to protect the community from NCDS and increase consumer knowledge of SSF content in processed and ready-to-eat foods, the Ministry of Health issued Regulation No. 63 of 2015 as an Amendment to Regulation of the Ministry of Health No. 30 of 2013, on the obligation of the inclusion of SSF information as well as obligatory Health Messages on Processed and Ready Food[3].

Nevertheless, previous studies found that health related information on food products were of little concern to shoppers[4]. Research confirms that less than 10 percent of people review nutritional information before purchasing food[5]. Furthermore, most societies have problems understanding and assessing nutritional information labels[6].

A solution is the inclusion of SSF information and health messages on media boards owned by ready-to-eat food providers, such as school cafeterias. Menu boards are a helpful means of communicating health messages where the effectiveness of the message relies on the ability of the media source to influence the target group who should be able to easily read and understand the relevance of the information detailed[7]. The aims of this study are to provide examples of menu board design to convey SSF information and health messages in school cafeterias.

Methods

This study used a research and development model.

The development model used a modification of the research and development steps proposed by Borg and Gall[8]. Based on the development model, the development procedure in this research was divided into five stages: needs analysis; media design; media production; formative evaluation; and summative evaluation. This study only reached stage 4. Formative evaluation was comprised of one to one evaluation, small group evaluation and field evaluation. Summative evaluation was completed after the program was formatively evaluated and revised.

The needs analysis was assessed by studying government policy to control NCDs. Further research was conducted on conditions of school cafeterias, types of snack food available and types of media information in the school canteen. Needs analysis can be seen in Figure 1.

The media content was based on the Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia No. 30 of 2013 on inclusion of SSF content information and Health Message for Processed and Ready Food.

Production of menu board media that lists SSF information as well as health messages with steps are shown in Figure 2.

Formative evaluation was made up of validation, testing and product revision. Validation by material experts included aspects of content whilst media experts reviewed technical and appearance aspects. The trials were conducted through one to one evaluation, small group evaluation and field trials followed by data analysis and product revisions based on the results of the trial. More details can be seen in Figure 3.

Subjects in the media validation stage consisted of one material expert and one media expert. The product trial stage consisted of 196 high school students divided as follows: ten respondents for focus group discussion (FGD) with media board menu A; 55 respondents for site test on menu board media design B (based on FGD results); 71 respondents for site test on menu board media design C (based on site test results on menu board with design B); and; 60 respondents for site test on menu board media design D (based on the results of site tests of the design menu board C).

A questionnaire was developed to evaluate menu boards B, C and D. Descriptive statistical analysis techniques used to process data obtained through questionnaires in the form of scores were converted into values or categories, as presented in Table I[10].

Results and discussion

The resulting media products consist of menu boards A, B, C and D. The health message on SSF content for the menu boards was agreed as follows: “Consumption of sugar more than 50 grams, Sodium over 2,000 milligrams or total Fat more than 67 grams per person per day risk of hypertension, stroke, diabetes, and heart attack.”

The presentation of information begins with SSF information for each snack food followed by the health message placed below, in a central position. This is consistent with previous research on readability[11]. Images and easy to read text were also deemed important to successfully imparting this health message[12]. Similarly, contrasting text colors against a single color background helps to facilitate readability[13].

Menu board A comprised of a white background, red and black text and included images of sugar and oil.

Students were questioned on comprehension, acceptability, attractiveness, self-involvement and persuasiveness aspects of menu board A (Figure 4). Menu board B (Figure 5) was made with Green and White writing color and included a pattern in each corner of the board, as shown in Figure 2.

Menu board C was made in basic color yellow, black SSF text with health messages in red text including the source of SSF data, as shown in Figure 6.

Menu board D (Figure 7) was made with black base color, SSF information writing color is white and the health message in yellow, as shown in Figure 4.

The results were given in Table II.

As indicated on Table II, menu boards C and D contained higher “good” and “very good” scores making them most feasible for use.

In order to achieve optimum results, feedback from high school students as well as media and material experts are crucial to its development. Suggestions for improvement from the above include the following: the base color of the board should be brighter and more neutral; the menu board should not have a motive or image considering the extent of information that must be delivered; information should be presented in table form so it is easy to read the SSF content for each dish sold in the cafeteria; the selected writing color should contrast with the base color; the health message should be distinguishable by the color of the SSF information; the authorized institution responsible for producing facts should be stated to increase credibility; uncomplicated fonts adjusted to the right distant reading size should be used to aid visibility.

Conclusion

It can be summarized that menu boards in cafeterias can be used to effectively educate high school students about health and SSF content in their diet.

Figures

The first stage of menu boards development procedures for inclusion of SSF information as well as health message

Figure 1

The first stage of menu boards development procedures for inclusion of SSF information as well as health message

Menu development procedures for inclusion of SSF information as well as a third health message

Figure 2

Menu development procedures for inclusion of SSF information as well as a third health message

Procedures of menu development for inclusion of SSF information and fourth-level health messages

Figure 3

Procedures of menu development for inclusion of SSF information and fourth-level health messages

Menu board A

Figure 4

Menu board A

Menu board B

Figure 5

Menu board B

Menu board C

Figure 6

Menu board C

Menu board D

Figure 7

Menu board D

Score conversion became a value on a scale of five

Categories Score
Formula Calculations
Excellent X>µi+1.8 Sbi X>4.3
Good µi+0.6 Sbi<Xµi+1.8 Sbi 3.4<X⩽4.3
Enough µi−0.6 Sbi<Xµi+0.6 Sbi 2.6<X⩽3.4
Bad µi–1.8 Sbi <Xµi−0.6 Sbi 1.8<X⩽2.6
Very bad X⩽µi−1.8 Sbi X⩽1.8

Notes: Information: ideal mean (µi)=1/2×(Max.+Min.) =3; Sbi = 1/6× (Max.−Min.) =0.7; max. score =5; min score =1; X = actual score

Result of board menu assessments B, C and D

Menu B Menu C Menu D
NO Component Score Category Score Category Score Category
1. Attraction 3.1 Enough 4.0 Good 4.4 Excellent
2. Comprehension 4.0 Good 4.3 Good 4.6 Excellent
3. Acceptability 3.6 Good 4.0 Good 4.5 Excellent
4. Self-involvement 4.0 Good 4.3 Good 4.6 Excellent
5. Persuasion 3.8 Good 4.3 Good 4.5 Excellent
6. Graphics 3.2 Enough 3.9 Good 4.2 Good

References

1. Health Ministry of the Republic of Indonesia. Basic Health Research 2013. Jakarta: Agency for Health Research and Development of Republic of Indonesia; 2013.

2. Jamison DT, Summers LH, Alleyne G, Arrow KJ, Berkley S, Binagwaho A, et al. Global health 2035: a world converging within a generation. Salud Publica Mex. 2015 Sep-Oct; 57(5): 444-67.

3. Health Ministry of the Republic of Indonesia Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 63 of 2015 on Amendment of Minister of Health Regulation No. 30 of 2013 concerning inclusion of sugar, salt and fat content information and health message for prepared food and ready to eat food. Jakarta: Health Ministry; 2015.

4. Agency for Drug and Food Control of Republic of Indonesia Study of Housewife Awareness and Behavior on Food Security in Bogor City and Regency. Jakarta: Directorate of Food Safety Surveillance and Extension; 2013.

5. Roberto CA, Agnew H, Brownell KD. An observational study of consumers’ accessing of nutrition information in chain restaurants. Am J Public Health. 2009 May; 99(5): 820-1. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2008.136457

6. Gracia A, Loureiro M, Nayga RM. Do consumers perceive benefits from the implementation of a EU mandatory nutritional labelling program? Food Policy. 2007; 32(2): 160-74. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.04.002

7. Hamidi. Research Methods and Communication Theory: a Practical Approach to Writing a Proposal and a Research Report. Malang: UMM Press; 2007.

8. Borg WR, Gall MD. Educational Research: an Introduction. 4th ed., New York, NY: Longman; 1983.

9. Sukardjo. Handbook of Evaluation of Learning Lecture: PPs Yogyakarta State University. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta; 2010.

10. Nielsen J. F-shaped pattern for reading web content. [cited 2017 Oct 10]. Available from: www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_pattern.html

11. Sudirman N. Science of Education. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya; 1992.

12. Aryani D. Story Illustrated Book as Health Promotion Media for Early Prevalence of Sexual violence at Elementary School Students in Yogyakarta City. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University; 2009.

13. Anitah S. Media of Education. Surakarta: Yuma Presindo; 2009.

Corresponding author

Rita Ramayulis can be contacted at: ritaramayulis2@gmail.com

Related articles