To read this content please select one of the options below:

Psychological contract congruence, distributive justice, and commitment

Si Hyun Kim (University of La Verne, La Verne, California, USA)
Giacomo Laffranchini (University of La Verne, La Verne, California, USA)
Maria Fernanda Wagstaff (The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA)
Wonho Jeung (Graduate College of Defense Management, Korea National Defense University, Goyang-si, Republic of Korea)

Journal of Managerial Psychology

ISSN: 0268-3946

Article publication date: 13 February 2017

1772

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between congruence between employee and employer psychological contract fulfillment and commitment. The authors further studied how the relationship is moderated by distributive justice.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors conducted polynomial regression analyses with response surface methodology on two Korean samples.

Findings

Congruence between employee and employer psychological contract fulfillment was positively related to affective commitment and occupational commitment. Distributive justice moderated these relationships.

Research limitations/implications

The main limitation was common method bias as a result of the cross-sectional nature of the study designs.

Practical implications

Employers must be vigilant not only with regard to fulfilling employees’ psychological contracts but also to doing this fairly.

Originality/value

The authors studied the interaction effect of distributive justice on the relationship between psychological contract congruence and commitment in Korea.

Keywords

Citation

Kim, S.H., Laffranchini, G., Wagstaff, M.F. and Jeung, W. (2017), "Psychological contract congruence, distributive justice, and commitment", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-05-2015-0182

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles