To read this content please select one of the options below:

Benchmarking HRM and the benchmarking of benchmarking: Best practices from outside the square in the Australian finance industry

John J. Rodwell (Centre for Change Management, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia)
Jeremy Lam (Monash University, Caulfield East, Victoria, Australia, and)
Maureen Fastenau (Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia)

Employee Relations

ISSN: 0142-5455

Article publication date: 1 August 2000

3230

Abstract

Organisations with low absenteeism and low turnover can be distinguished from organisations with high absenteeism and turnover through the identification and implementation of sophisticated and strategic best practices such as benchmarking relative cost position, developing a corporate ethic, valuing the negotiation of an enterprise agreement, and not having a written OH&S policy. Several of the remaining 16 practices identified in the literature as best practices, including benchmarking customer service, having a policy addressing recruitment, selection and promotion, were shown to be standard industry practice in the AFI. The findings suggest that benchmarking allows organisations to identify and replicate the innovations of competitors, but competitive advantage requires innovation rather than replication.

Keywords

Citation

Rodwell, J.J., Lam, J. and Fastenau, M. (2000), "Benchmarking HRM and the benchmarking of benchmarking: Best practices from outside the square in the Australian finance industry", Employee Relations, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 356-374. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425450010372619

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2000, MCB UP Limited

Related articles