To read this content please select one of the options below:

An analysis of the embodied energy of office buildings by height

G.J. Treloar (G.J. Treloar is at the School of Architecture, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.)
R. Fay (R. Fay is at the School of Architecture, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia.)
B. Ilozor (B. Ilozor is at the School of Architecture, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.)
P.E.D. Love (P.E.D. Love is at the School of Architecture, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.)

Facilities

ISSN: 0263-2772

Article publication date: 1 May 2001

3608

Abstract

Aims to compare the energy embodied in office buildings varying in height from a few storeys to over 50 storeys. The energy embodied in substructure, superstructure and finishes elements was investigated for five Melbourne office buildings of the following heights: 3, 7, 15, 42 and 52 storeys. The two high‐rise buildings have approximately 60 percent more energy embodied per unit gross floor area (GFA) in their materials than the low‐rise buildings. While building height was found to dictate the amount of energy embodied in the “structure group” elements (upper floors, columns, internal walls, external walls and staircases), other elements such as substructure, roof, windows and finishes seemed uninfluenced.

Keywords

Citation

Treloar, G.J., Fay, R., Ilozor, B. and Love, P.E.D. (2001), "An analysis of the embodied energy of office buildings by height", Facilities, Vol. 19 No. 5/6, pp. 204-214. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770110387797

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2001, MCB UP Limited

Related articles