To read this content please select one of the options below:

Creative errors and heroic failures: capturing their innovative potential

Bernd Kriegesmann (Professor for business administration at University of Applied Sciences at Gelsenkirchen, Germany and chairman of the board at the Institute for Applied Innovation Research (IAI), Bochum, Germany. He is a member of different expert groups and advisory boards, author and editor of various publications. He has worked with senior executives across many different industries. E‐mail: info@iai‐bochum.de.)
Thomas Kley (Scientific collaborator and project leader at the Institute for Applied Innovation Research. He has extensive experience in conducting empirical research projects in the field of competence development and innovation management.)
Markus G. Schwering (Scientific collaborator and project leader at the Institute for Applied Innovation Research. In his PhD thesis he has analysed competence development activities in innovative and fast growing enterprises.)

Journal of Business Strategy

ISSN: 0275-6668

Article publication date: 1 June 2005

2423

Abstract

Purpose

To highlight an unconventional way out of the “innovation dilemma,” relevant to many business organizations, innovative management and risk friendliness are necessary, but the way in which failure is handled and the resulting fear of making mistakes block the (innovative) efforts of specialists and managers.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper draws on theoretical as well as empirical work: first, the seemingly crystal‐clear concept of “error” is elaborated and the rare category of “creative errors” is introduced. Second, illustrative findings from a case study in the automotive sector are reported.

Findings

Suggests that a culturally exacerbated antipathy towards errors leads ultimately to a situation of pronounced innovational incompetence in which creative behavior is avoided. Points out, that not an “absolution of mistakes” is required, but a tolerance for legitimate errors which should only occur under exceptional circumstances. Underlines, that fairness in dealing with errors is considerably more important than a misguided attempt to create or maintain harmony. In addition to the philosophy and potential of this unusual incentive system, possible practical implementation problems are considered.

Research limitations/implications

Generalization is limited because the findings are based on only one case study. However, because of the vital importance of the so‐called “innovation dilemma,,” the exploratory findings of the study may trigger further empirical research on “creative errors.”

Practical implications

An initiative like the “Creative Error of the Month” may help to bring about cultural change towards a climate of trust and confidence in which innovative commitment is treated fairly even if it does not in fact succeed.

Originality/value

Common approaches to enhance organizational innovativeness reward “success stories” or praise “zero‐based cultures.” This case study suggests that a sophisticated initiative revolving around the “hidden” innovative potential of “creative errors” and “tragic failures” might prove to be a successful off‐beat attempt at stimulating creativity and innovative behavior in enterprises.

Keywords

Citation

Kriegesmann, B., Kley, T. and Schwering, M.G. (2005), "Creative errors and heroic failures: capturing their innovative potential", Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756660510597119

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles