To read this content please select one of the options below:

Impact of cash holdings and ownership concentration on firm valuation: Empirical evidence from Australia

Rashid Ameer (Accounting Research Institute, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Shah Alam, Malaysia)

Review of Accounting and Finance

ISSN: 1475-7702

Article publication date: 26 October 2012

4007

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of firms' cash holdings and ownership concentration on the firms' valuation using an unbalanced panel dataset of non‐financial listed firms in Australia.

Design/methodology/approach

The author used a generalized method of moments approach suitable for unbalanced panel dataset to examine the impact of firms' cash holdings and ownership concentration on firms' q‐ratios after controlling for the impact of financing, dividend and investment decisions, respectively.

Findings

The paper finds a positive relationship between cash holdings and q‐ratio of Australian firms. The ownership structure moderates the effect of cash holdings on q‐ratio in asymmetric fashion, i.e. for widely held firms, there is a positive relationship between cash holdings and q‐ratio; while for closely held firms, there is significant negative relationship between cash holdings and q‐ratio. Furthermore, changes associated with corporate governance reforms, also effect q‐ratio besides ownership structure. The paper also examined the impact of cash holdings on the market value of the firms over time. As the author predicted, increase in the cash holdings has a negative effect on the firms' market valuation, and this effect slows down over time. Overall, the empirical analysis finds support for similar findings documented for the developed countries in the literature.

Research limitations/implications

The sample consists of non‐financial listed firms over the period of 1995 to 2010.

Practical implications

The results imply that widely‐owned firms have lower cash holdings because managers are able to access capital market easily compared to firms with concentrated ownership, which might have complex agency and information asymmetry problems. These findings are consistent with the agency costs. Managers in less widely‐held firms have more discretion over cash holding policies, and the value reduction imposed on these firms may reflect shareholders' recognition of the possibility of managerial expropriations.

Originality/value

This is believed to be the first paper to explore agency costs of cash holdings for Australian firms.

Keywords

Citation

Ameer, R. (2012), "Impact of cash holdings and ownership concentration on firm valuation: Empirical evidence from Australia", Review of Accounting and Finance, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 448-467. https://doi.org/10.1108/14757701211279196

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles