To read this content please select one of the options below:

Rule 12b‐1: a look at the past, present and future

Michael R. Rosella (Partner and Global Chair, Investment Management Practice, at Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, New York, New York, USA.)
Domenick Pugliese (Partner, Investment Management Group, at Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, New York, New York, USA.)

Journal of Investment Compliance

ISSN: 1528-5812

Article publication date: 19 June 2007

479

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to assess the history, current use, and possible future of Rule 12b‐1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper briefly reviews the history behind the original adoption of Rule 12b‐1, then discusses the ways in which 12b‐1 fees are used today, some of the issues surrounding the Rule, and finally, briefly explores where we might be heading in the future.

Findings

The paper finds that, first adopted in 1980 in an effort to prop up a then ailing industry, Rule 12b‐1 and Rule 12b‐1 fees have been a staple for many mutual funds for almost 30 years. Over this time, the ways in which 12b‐1 fees are used has evolved significantly such that some people now wonder whether the Rule continues to serve the purpose for which it was designed.

Originality/value

The paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of how mutual funds' use of Rule 12b‐1 has changed, what the underlying issues are, and the prospects for reexamination of the Rule.

Keywords

Citation

Rosella, M.R. and Pugliese, D. (2007), "Rule 12b‐1: a look at the past, present and future", Journal of Investment Compliance, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/15285810710759434

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2007, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles