To read this content please select one of the options below:

Performance of open‐ended real estate funds in Germany: Are institutional investors better off than retail investors?

Björn‐Martin Kurzrock (Department of Regional Planning, Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany)
Sebastian Gläsner (Investment Property Databank GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany)
Elaine Wilke (Investment Property Databank GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany)

Journal of European Real Estate Research

ISSN: 1753-9269

Article publication date: 17 July 2009

824

Abstract

Purpose

In Germany, open‐ended funds represent the prevailing form of indirect real estate investment for retail and institutional investors. The purpose of this paper is to address whether significant performance differences occur between retail and institutional funds.

Design/methodology/approach

The relative fund performance of 137 funds investing in Germany and abroad are each measured against tailored Investment Property Databank performance benchmarks of direct property investments. Such benchmarks shall mimic the asset allocation of any particular fund. Data on retail fund performance are retrieved from the fund association BVI, the data on institutional fund performance are derived from the individual statements of accounts for each fund.

Findings

German open‐ended funds show significant differences in mean relative returns. The differences are mainly driven by the respective asset allocation of the funds, although relative returns against tailored benchmarks as dependent variables are supposed to offset country‐specific return fluctuations. Institutional investors tend to be better‐off than retail investors.

Research limitations/implications

Liquidity holdings are not (and can not be) extracted from fund performance with the given data. In this regard, it must be acknowledged that retail funds by nature are induced to carry more liquidity. Second, the high significance of the factor asset allocation may indicate that country‐specific benchmarks could still be tailored more effectively. However, the conclusions from this paper remain unaffected. Ex post variations in the grouping of funds explain additional fund performance variance. In particular, it would be interesting to analyze the performance patterns of single‐investor funds and the influence or control that is being exercised by single‐investors in institutional funds.

Originality/value

Results give new insights into the performance of open‐ended real estate funds. The analysis helps explaining performance patterns and contributes to an improved understanding of the German indirect real estate investment market.

Keywords

Citation

Kurzrock, B., Gläsner, S. and Wilke, E. (2009), "Performance of open‐ended real estate funds in Germany: Are institutional investors better off than retail investors?", Journal of European Real Estate Research, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 110-131. https://doi.org/10.1108/17539260910978445

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles