To read this content please select one of the options below:

Critical factors and performance indicators: accreditation of testing- and calibration-laboratories

Nagarajan Karthiyayini (Central Electronics Centre, IIT Madras, Chennai, India)
Chandrasekharan Rajendran (Department of Management Studies, IIT Madras, Chennai, India)

Benchmarking: An International Journal

ISSN: 1463-5771

Article publication date: 2 October 2017

876

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to determine the critical factors (CRFs) of IS/ISO/IEC 17025:2005 laboratory accreditation and indicators of the performance (IOPs) in the testing/calibration laboratories. The impact of accreditation on the performance is analyzed using the level of presence of critical factors that can be used to benchmark the best practices in the accredited testing and calibration laboratories.

Design/methodology/approach

A questionnaire is designed on the basis of an extensive literature review on laboratory accreditation and performance. Based on the responses from pilot study, the developed instrument is tested for its unidimensionality, reliability and validity. Multiple regression analysis is carried out to analyze the impact of critical factors on the IOPs.

Findings

The findings reveal that the six distinct critical dimensions of laboratory accreditation (which are the independent variables) have a significant impact on the performance of the accredited testing/calibration laboratories. The performance is measured by the dependent variables which are the IOPs. The customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, laboratory performance, image of the laboratory, the number of increased customers and loyalty of the existing customers are highly influenced by the accreditation which in turn improves the performance to gain the competitive advantage.

Research limitations/implications

Contribution to research is in the area of laboratory accreditation and the performance measurement by the development of a comprehensive instrument to analyze the Laboratory Quality Management System. The results are dependent on the number of respondents who are the quality/technical managers.

Practical implications

This instrument would enable the accredited laboratories to analyze their performance through the feedback from the quality/technical managers to gain credibility and to continually improve and benchmark the quality management system in alignment with the quality policies.

Originality/value

This paper proposes an instrument to measure and benchmark the performance of the accredited testing and calibration laboratories.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the reviewers and the editor for the suggestions and comments to improve the paper.

Citation

Karthiyayini, N. and Rajendran, C. (2017), "Critical factors and performance indicators: accreditation of testing- and calibration-laboratories", Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 24 No. 7, pp. 1814-1833. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2016-0058

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles