To read this content please select one of the options below:

Injured workers and their return to work: Beyond individual disability and economic incentives

Monica Galizzi (Department of Economics and Center for Women and Work (CWW), University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA)
Roberto Leombruni (Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy AND LABORatorio Riccardo Revelli, Centre for Employment Studies, Moncalieri, Italy)
Lia Pacelli (Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy AND LABORatorio Riccardo Revelli, Centre for Employment Studies, Moncalieri, Italy)
Antonella Bena (Epidemiologia Piemonte, Grugliasco, Italy)

Evidence-based HRM

ISSN: 2049-3983

Article publication date: 4 April 2016

891

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to study the factors affecting the return to work (RTW) of injured workers in an institutional setting where workers’ earnings are fully compensated during the disability period.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors use a unique data set matching employer-employee panel data with Italian workers’ compensation records. The authors estimate survival models accounting for workers’ unobserved heterogeneity.

Findings

Workers with higher wage growth, higher relative wages and from firms with better histories of stable employment, RTW sooner. More vulnerable workers – immigrants, females, members of smaller firms – also tend to return sooner. But even when we control for such measures of commitment, status, and job security, high-wage workers RTW sooner.

Research limitations/implications

The authors use proxies as measures of commitment and status. The authors study blue-collar workers without finer job qualifications. The authors estimate a reduced form model.

Practical implications

In an institutional environment where the immediate cost of workers’ compensation benefits falls largely on firms, employers seem to pressure those workers whose time off is more costly, i.e., high-wage workers. The lack of evidence of ex post moral hazard behavior also demands for a better understanding of the relationship between benefits and RTW.

Social implications

Workers who are induced to RTW before full recovery jeopardize their long- term health and employability. Firms that put such pressure on employees might generate social costs that can be particularity high in the case of high productivity workers.

Originality/value

The paper offers the first quantitative analysis of an institutional setting where injured workers face 100 percent benefits replacement rate and have job security. This allows focus on other workers’ or employers’ reasons to speed RTW. It is one of very few economics studies on this topic in the European context, providing implications for human resource managers, state regulators, and unions.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Regione Piemonte, Project No. 0135000015A, “From work to health and back.” The funding source had no involvement in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

The authors thank Les Boden, the colleagues of the UMass Lowell Center for Women and Work, and the two anonymous referees who offered many useful suggestions and comments on this study.

Citation

Galizzi, M., Leombruni, R., Pacelli, L. and Bena, A. (2016), "Injured workers and their return to work: Beyond individual disability and economic incentives", Evidence-based HRM, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 2-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-02-2015-0002

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles