To read this content please select one of the options below:

An analytic hierarchy process for school quality and inspection: Model development and application

Amal Al Qubaisi (Abu Dhabi Education Council, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)
Masood Badri (Abu Dhabi Education Council, and UAE University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)
Jihad Mohaidat (Strategic Planning office, Abu Dhabi Education Council, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)
Hamad Al Dhaheri (Abu Dhabi Education Council, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)
Guang Yang (Abu Dhabi Education Council, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)
Asma Al Rashedi (Abu Dhabi Education Council, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)
Kenneth Greer (Abu Dhabi Education Council, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)

International Journal of Educational Management

ISSN: 0951-354X

Article publication date: 11 April 2016

1419

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to develop an analytic hierarchy planning-based framework to establish criteria weights and to develop a school performance system commonly called school inspections.

Design/methodology/approach

The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model uses pairwise comparisons and a measurement scale to generate the weights for the criteria. The validity of the approach is confirmed by comparing the outputs of school inspection and the outputs of the model in a sample of schools.

Findings

The framework proposed enables school management to address several issues pertaining to its competitive advantage with other schools, the two most important being establishing its performance ranking in the marketplace and identifying the service elements that most require improvement. This study develops a cohesive approach to identify which quality attributes or dimensions require attention.

Research limitations/implications

For school inspections, the data collection and computational problems would increase with the increase in the number of criteria and sub-criteria, as well as the number of schools considered in the selection. Although the range of reported AHP applications is extensive in many disciplines, examples in school quality and inspection remain still rare; as a result, this study could not compare its results with other AHP applications in school inspection or assessment.

Practical implications

The AHP method has the distinct advantage that it decomposes a decision problem into its constituent parts and builds hierarchies of criteria. AHP enables assessors to capture both subjective and objective evaluation measures of school quality. By providing a useful mechanism for assessing the consistency of the evaluation measures and alternatives, the AHP reduces bias in decision making.

Social implications

The AHP model also provides a more systematic evaluation of a given school’s qualitative performance criteria. The proposed AHP model is attractive to assessors and decision makers because its pairwise comparison procedure enables them to offer a relative (rather than absolute) individual criterion assessment on those qualitative factors.

Originality/value

The AHP model could become a sustainable component of overall school system quality improvement by maturing over time. The AHP annual scores could be used as realistic and measureable gauges for measuring school improvement.

Keywords

Citation

Al Qubaisi, A., Badri, M., Mohaidat, J., Al Dhaheri, H., Yang, G., Al Rashedi, A. and Greer, K. (2016), "An analytic hierarchy process for school quality and inspection: Model development and application", International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 437-459. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2014-0123

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles