To read this content please select one of the options below:

A comparison of two minimum quantity lubrication delivery systems

Sheri Kurgin (General Motors Powertrain Division, Pontiac, Michigan, USA)
Jean M. Dasch (General Motors Research and Development, Warren, Michigan, USA)
Daniel L. Simon (General Motors Center for Human Resources, Detroit, Michigan, USA)
Gary C. Barber (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, USA)
Qian Zou (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, USA)

Industrial Lubrication and Tribology

ISSN: 0036-8792

Article publication date: 4 February 2014

492

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to compare the performance of single- and dual-channel minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) for reaming spool bores in an automotive transmission valve body.

Design/methodology/approach

Machining experiments are conducted under various parameters for both single- and dual-channel MQL. Comparison metrics include part surface temperature, spindle power consumption and hole quality. Experimental data from traditional through-tool flood coolant are provided as a baseline for spindle power consumption and part quality.

Findings

The results show that with proper tooling and machining parameters, dual-channel MQL can perform equivalently or better than flood coolant. Single-channel MQL was not deemed suitable for this machining application.

Practical implications

The results of the study show that MQL can be successfully applied for precision reaming of aluminum and can provide guidance in developing an MQL system.

Originality/value

Few studies have been performed for reaming holes in general, and very few studies have been performed for reaming with MQL. Reaming is a critical operation used to create holes with precise quality. No study was found in the literature review that directly compared the performance of single- and dual-channel MQL delivery systems.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge General Motors Powertrain Division for sponsorship of the research. In addition, the authors would like to thank Paula Deeds of Powertrain and Tony Blaszyk, Brian Hagood, Donald Chester, Bill Grimes and Curt Wong of General Motors Research and Development for their assistance with the project.

Citation

Kurgin, S., M. Dasch, J., L. Simon, D., C. Barber, G. and Zou, Q. (2014), "A comparison of two minimum quantity lubrication delivery systems", Industrial Lubrication and Tribology, Vol. 66 No. 1, pp. 151-159. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILT-07-2011-0055

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles