To read this content please select one of the options below:

Evaluation of an Australian domestic abuse program for offending males

Chris Blatch (Offender Services and Programs Branch, Corrective Services New South Wales, NSW Department of Justice, Sydney, Australia)
Kevin O'Sullivan (School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia)
Jordan J Delaney (Actevate Pty. Ltd., Sydney, Australia)
Gerard van Doorn (Research, Evaluation and Statistics Branch, Corrective Services New South Wales, NSW Department of Justice, Sydney, Australia)
Tamara Sweller (CUBIT, Metropolitan Special Purpose Centre, Corrective Services New South Wales, NSW Department of Justice, Sydney, Australia)

Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research

ISSN: 1759-6599

Article publication date: 11 January 2016

1821

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to determine recidivism outcomes for 953 offending men with domestic violence histories, serving community-based sentences and enroled in the domestic abuse program (DAP), provided by Corrective Services New South Wales in Australia.

Design/methodology/approach

An intention to treat definition of DAP participation and a quasi-experimental and pseudo-prospective research design compared recidivism outcomes of the treatment group to a propensity score matched control group. Cox and Poisson regression techniques determined survival time to first reconviction and rates of reconvictions adjusted for time at risk.

Findings

DAP enrolment was associated with significant improvements in odds of time to first general reconviction (15 per cent) and first violent reconviction (by 27 per cent) compared to controls. Reconviction rates were significantly lower (by 15 per cent) for DAP enrolees. Programme completion was necessary for significant therapeutic effect; 62 per cent completed the programme.

Practical implications

This evaluation suggests the 20 session DAP is an effective intervention which could be adopted by other jurisdictions to modify criminal behaviours of domestically abusive men; potentially lessening the physical, emotional and financial impacts on victims and providing savings to government and criminal justice systems. The methodology, with refinements, could be adopted by other service providers to evaluate similar community-based therapeutic interventions in forensic settings.

Originality/value

First peer reviewed evaluation of the DAP. The programme contributes to evidence-based best practice interventions for domestically violent men.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Research for this paper was undertaken by officers of New South Wales Corrective Services, using internal funding and resources. Data for the study came from the standing collections of New South Wales’s Corrective Services and Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research. Analysis and interpretation of the data were undertaken by Corrective Services, with assistance from interns of the University of NSW’s Forensic Psychology Master’s program. The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this paper. Since the completion of the study, Corrective Services New South Wales has changed its terminology. Staff who were formerly Probation and Parole Officers are now known as Community Corrections Officers and Community Offender Services is now known as the Community Corrections Division. The new terms have been used throughout this paper.

Citation

Blatch, C., O'Sullivan, K., Delaney, J.J., van Doorn, G. and Sweller, T. (2016), "Evaluation of an Australian domestic abuse program for offending males", Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-10-2015-0194

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles