To read this content please select one of the options below:

Stakeholder dialogue: strategic tool or wasted words?

Laetitia Guibert (Laboratoires Expanscience, Cedex, France)
Julia Roloff (Centre for Responsible Business, ESC Rennes School of Business, Rennes, France)

Journal of Business Strategy

ISSN: 0275-6668

Article publication date: 18 September 2017

1351

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to identify which stakeholder dialogue approach has the best outcomes. Moreover, it is investigated how stakeholder dialogue practices are linked to the quality of stakeholder management and the maturity of corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategy.

Design/methodology/approach

Twelve CSR managers of 11 French enterprises are interviewed.

Findings

Four different types of stakeholder dialogue are identified and their characteristics, as well as the opportunities and risks connected to each approach, are discussed.

Research limitations/implications

Only a limited number of enterprises operating in France are studied. More research is needed to ensure the generalisability to other countries and to identify the prevalence of each dialogue type.

Practical implications

Proactive companies manage their stakeholders in a mutually beneficial way and receive more stakeholder support on strategic issues. They discuss issues material to stakeholders, include a wide range of stakeholders and organise frequent meetings. This approach, the Hanoï Dialogue, has the best outcomes and is, therefore, best practice.

Social implications

Stakeholder dialogue is key for the development of CSR strategies which truly benefit society.

Originality/value

Although stakeholder dialogues become empirically more relevant, most researchers conduct single-case studies of good practices and do not systematically compare a range of practices.

Keywords

Citation

Guibert, L. and Roloff, J. (2017), "Stakeholder dialogue: strategic tool or wasted words?", Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-07-2016-0071

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles