To read this content please select one of the options below:

How does the estate tax affect the number of firms?

Pavel A. Yakovlev (Department of Economics and Statistics, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA)
Antony Davies (Department of Economics and Statistics, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA)

Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy

ISSN: 2045-2101

Article publication date: 14 April 2014

997

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to estimate the effect of the combined (Federal and state) estate, inheritance, and gift (EIG) tax burden per decedent on the number of firms in the USA.

Design/methodology/approach

Estimates are based on a longitudinal panel of 50 American states from 1988 to 2006.

Findings

The paper finds that the growth in the EIG tax burden per decedent significantly reduces the growth in the number of firms, especially small firms. The higher dissolution rate among small firms can be attributed to the asymmetric liquidity effect, which limits the ability of small business owners to raise the funds needed to pay the estate tax without liquidating their estates.

Practical implications

The estimates suggest that the reductions in EIG taxes, brought about by the passage of 2001 EGTRRA, have lead to a higher growth in the number of firms, ceteris paribus.

Social implications

As of this writing, the future of the Federal estate tax looks uncertain. Policymakers should note that the estate tax lowers competition and economic growth, which hurts both the poor and the rich.

Originality/value

This study is the first to examine the impact of the combined (Federal and state) EIG tax burden on the number of firms using state-level panel data.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

JEL Classifications — C23, H21, H24, H25, H30, H71

This study is based on an earlier work funded by the American Family Business Foundation.

Citation

A. Yakovlev, P. and Davies, A. (2014), "How does the estate tax affect the number of firms?", Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 96-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-09-2012-0045

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles