To read this content please select one of the options below:

A review and critique of content analysis as a methodology for inquiring into IC disclosure

John Dumay (Department of Accounting and Corporate Governance, Faculty of Business and Economics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia)
Linlin Cai (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR)

Journal of Intellectual Capital

ISSN: 1469-1930

Article publication date: 8 April 2014

3421

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to review and critique the current status of content analysis (CA) as a research method for inquiring into intellectual capital disclosure (ICD) to determine if CA has a continued role to play in developing new intellectual capital (IC) knowledge.

Design/methodology/approach

In all, 110 articles utilising CA as a research methodology for inquiring into ICD are analysed. The research is developed in line with other articles critically investigating IC research conducted by Guthrie et al. (2012), Dumay and Garanina (2013) and Dumay (2014). To help understand the impact of CA research articles, the data set is supplemented by including citation data from Google Scholar. The authors also differentiate the paper from other IC research reviews by critically examining the findings and implications of the articles analysed.

Findings

The authors do not hold a very positive view on future research which does not substantially depart from the plethora of articles examining ICD using annual reports as a data source or who do not in some way radically change the approach. The authors are of the view that early research into ICD using CA as a methodology was warranted because there was little knowledge about the pattern of IC disclosure in annual reports and other possible ICD forms. However, the research into ICD using annual reports and other data sources has added little more than prove that companies are unwilling to publicly disclose IC to their stakeholders. While the authors do not hold a positive view on future CA research based on annual reports, the authors do hold out hope that researchers will transform their understanding and application of CA as a research methodology and offer one example of how this might be achieved.

Originality/value

The paper presents a comprehensive critical review of published articles utilising CA as a research methodology for inquiring into ICD along with measuring the impact of the articles using citation data from Google Scholar. Hence, the research and its impacts are simultaneously assessed offering insights into the future role that CA as a research methodology has to play in developing new IC knowledge.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors especially want to thank Rory Chase, Goran Roos, Subhash Abhayawansa and Leif Edvinsson for allowing them to share some of their insights into CA as a research methodology. The authors are also grateful to Jenny Hatton for her editorial feedback on early drafts, and Fiona Crawford of Macquarie University for her sterling efforts to refine the paper's presentation.

The authors have invited James Guthrie to write a research note in conjunction with this paper, in which he offers his comments and personal view on the future of CA. This is published later in this issue of JIC.

Citation

Dumay, J. and Cai, L. (2014), "A review and critique of content analysis as a methodology for inquiring into IC disclosure", Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 264-290. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-01-2014-0010

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles