To read this content please select one of the options below:

On strategic trade-offs: does the principle of energy conservation explain the trade-offs law?

Matthias Thürer (Jinan University, Zhuhai, China)
Mark Stevenson (Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK)
Roberto Sarmiento (Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosi, Mexico)
Peter Gianiodis (Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA)

Management Research Review

ISSN: 2040-8269

Article publication date: 20 November 2017

293

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to reaffirm the suggestion that there are at least two distinct types of laws of trade-off that affect all firms and, in doing so, to contribute toward resolving the persistent trade-off debate in the literature.

Design/methodology/approach

Conceptual study using implicit deductive reasoning.

Findings

Two types of trade-offs are identified: “internal” can be understood following the dictates of the law of diminishing returns, while “external” can be modeled using the principle of energy conservation.

Research limitations/implications

New insights are provided by discussing the impact of both laws of trade-off on the resource-based view of the firm, on new capabilities such as sustainability and innovativeness and on key strategic choices.

Practical implications

The study explains why trade-offs occur and outlines contextual factors that determine the “strength” of the trade-offs.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no previous study has attempted to investigate the topic of strategic trade-offs on the basis of the principle of energy conservation.

Keywords

Citation

Thürer, M., Stevenson, M., Sarmiento, R. and Gianiodis, P. (2017), "On strategic trade-offs: does the principle of energy conservation explain the trade-offs law?", Management Research Review, Vol. 40 No. 11, pp. 1163-1174. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2016-0214

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles