Wikipedia: friend or foe?
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to report on a research study that entailed the rigorous evaluation of the quality of a large multidisciplinary sample of Wikipedia articles. The objective of the paper is to assess whether Wikipedia can be used and recommended as a credible reference or information tool.
Design/methodology/approach
The 106 randomly generated Wikipedia articles are analyzed and evaluated on specific criteria (completeness, accuracy, presentation, objectivity, and overall quality). Articles are reviewed from a broad range of subject areas: arts, popular culture, entertainment, geography, history, science, technology, people, entities, and politics.
Findings
The findings indicate that overall the articles are objective, clearly presented, reasonably accurate, and complete, although some are poorly written, contain unsubstantiated information, and/or provide shallow coverage of a topic.
Research limitations/implications
Further research on evaluating Wikipedia entries should include reviewing outward links to more accurately assess overall quality.
Practical implications
Wikipedia has a role as a reference and instruction tool.
Originality/value
This paper provides empirical data on a large number of articles on a wide range of disciplines in Wikipedia, supporting its use as an acceptable encyclopedia.
Keywords
Citation
West, K. and Williamson, J. (2009), "Wikipedia: friend or foe?", Reference Services Review, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 260-271. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320910982758
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited