To read this content please select one of the options below:

Stiffness and inertia multicriteria evolutionary structural optimisation

K.A. Proos (School of Aerospace, Mechatronic and Mechanical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Biomaterials Science Research Unit, National Innovation Centre, Eveleigh, NSW, Australia)
G.P. Steven (School of Engineering, University of Durham, Durham, UK)
O.M. Querin (School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK)
Y.M. Xie (Faculty of Engineering and Science, Victoria University of Technology, Victoria, Australia)

Engineering Computations

ISSN: 0264-4401

Article publication date: 1 November 2001

795

Abstract

In continuation of the recent development of Evolutionary Structural Optimisation (ESO) applied to the simultaneous objective to maximise the natural frequency and to minimise the mean compliance, presents the Multicriteria ESO optimisation of two new criteria. This has been done with the use of four different multicriteria methods. Three examples have been used to verify the usefulness and capability of these methods applied to ESO in the context of the aforementioned criteria. Concluded that the ESO weighting method is proficient in presenting the designer with a range of options (of Pareto attribute) taking into account multiple criteria, and the global criterion method has the tendency to produce shapes and topologies that resemble that of the weighted 50 per cent: 50 per cent method. Likewise, the logical OR operator method produced designs that corresponded directly to those of 100 per cent stiffness weighted criteria. No clear resemblance could be concluded with the case of the logical AND operator method.

Keywords

Citation

Proos, K.A., Steven, G.P., Querin, O.M. and Xie, Y.M. (2001), "Stiffness and inertia multicriteria evolutionary structural optimisation", Engineering Computations, Vol. 18 No. 7, pp. 1031-1054. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644400110404028

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2001, MCB UP Limited

Related articles