To read this content please select one of the options below:

Towards measuring the “SPC implementation/practice” construct: Some evidence of measurement quality

Manus Rungtusanatham (Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA)
John C. Anderson (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, and)
Kevin J. Dooley (Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA)

International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management

ISSN: 0265-671X

Article publication date: 1 June 1999

1297

Abstract

Describes the process and outcomes of operationalizing the 14 dimensions underlying the SPC implementation/practice construct. Employs a standard procedure to create a measurement instrument comprising 14 measurement scales, with the number of constituent measurement items ranging from one to four, that correspond to the 14 dimensions underlying the SPC implementation/practice construct. Reports the results of assessing three properties of measurement quality for these newly‐created measurement scales, namely: face validity, internal consistency reliability and uni‐dimensionality. Such a measurement instrument can then be applied to examine antecedents and consequences of SPC implementation/practice and to diagnose existing organizational efforts at implementing and practicing SPC and to identify opportunities to improve organizational implementation and practice of this quality improvement intervention. Demonstrates the application and interpretation of the SPC implementation/practice measurement instrument within one organizational setting. Concludes by identifying future research needs.

Keywords

Citation

Rungtusanatham, M., Anderson, J.C. and Dooley, K.J. (1999), "Towards measuring the “SPC implementation/practice” construct: Some evidence of measurement quality", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 301-329. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719910239938

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1999, MCB UP Limited

Related articles