To read this content please select one of the options below:

Leadership: is bad stronger than good?

Maria Fors Brandebo (Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership, Swedish Defence University, Karlstad, Sweden)
Sofia Nilsson (Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership, Swedish Defence University, Karlstad, Sweden)
Gerry Larsson (Department of Security, Strategy and Leadership, Swedish Defence University, Karlstad, Sweden AND Department of Public Health, Hedmark University College, Elverum, Norway)

Leadership & Organization Development Journal

ISSN: 0143-7739

Article publication date: 1 August 2016

5869

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to investigate if the thesis “bad is stronger than good” also holds true for a number of leadership issues, more specifically: trust in the immediate leader, emotional exhaustion, work atmosphere and propensity to leave.

Design/methodology/approach

Questionnaire responses were obtained from military personnel in Estonia, Sweden, Switzerland and the Netherlands (n=625).

Findings

Multiple regression analyses revealed a certain pattern. Constructive leadership behaviours showed stronger positive associations with trust in the immediate supervisor and work atmosphere, than destructive leadership behaviours showed negative associations. On the other hand, destructive leadership behaviours showed stronger positive associations with emotional exhaustion and propensity to leave, than constructive leadership behaviours showed negative associations. This suggests that constructive leadership behaviours possibly have a greater impact on positive phenomenon and/or phenomenon associated with work-related relationships. On the other hand, destructive leadership behaviours appear to have a greater impact on negative phenomena with a stronger personal meaning. The results also show that the passive forms of destructive leadership are the behaviours that had the strongest impact on the investigated dependent variables.

Research limitations/implications

Limitations related to item construction, common method variance, response set tendencies, translation of the instruments, and lack of response rate are discussed.

Practical implications

The results emphasize the importance of focusing on both constructive and destructive leadership at the selection stage, as well as during training of military leaders. Focusing on them separately obstructs optimal leader development and prevents leaders from gaining authentic self-knowledge. The results also point at the importance of including both aspects of leadership in leader evaluation processes.

Originality/value

The use of both constructive and destructive leadership behaviours with respondents from multiple nations in the same analysis.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Leo Kant for his comments on an earlier draft of the paper. The authors also thank Miriam C. de Graaff, MSc, Dutch Ministry of Defence, Merle Parmak, PhD, Estonian National Defence College and Andres Pfister, PhD, Military Academy at ETH Zurich for your collaboration and for collecting data for the present study.

Citation

Fors Brandebo, M., Nilsson, S. and Larsson, G. (2016), "Leadership: is bad stronger than good?", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 37 No. 6, pp. 690-710. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-09-2014-0191

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles