To read this content please select one of the options below:

Mega, monster or misplaced? Do portion size brand extensions meet consumer needs?

Elizabeth Taylor Quilliam (Department of Advertising, Public Relations and Retailing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA)

Journal of Consumer Marketing

ISSN: 0736-3761

Article publication date: 1 April 2006

2168

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine the brand extension tactics of food marketers, considering the implications in view of public health concerns related to obesity.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper provides examples of food marketers that have introduced and promoted healthy menu or product options and examples of product line extensions that are based on larger size as the differentiating attribute.

Findings

The paper finds that brand extensions that are based solely on introducing larger sizes may meet consumer needs and benefit organizations in the short term, but at the risk of diluting brand equity and compromising society's long‐term health goals.

Practical implications

The paper suggests that food marketers should consider long‐term brand equity issues and societal needs as well as short‐term corporate goals and immediate consumer needs when extending their brands.

Originality/value

The paper provides guidance for food marketers, identifying the potential shortcomings in applying the marketing concept to brand extension without consideration of broader societal needs.

Keywords

Citation

Taylor Quilliam, E. (2006), "Mega, monster or misplaced? Do portion size brand extensions meet consumer needs?", Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 123-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760610663277

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles