To read this content please select one of the options below:

Initiating sustainable development reporting: evidence from New Zealand

Jan Bebbington (University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK)
Colin Higgins (Faculty of Business and Law, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia)
Bob Frame (Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand)

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

ISSN: 0951-3574

Article publication date: 8 May 2009

7990

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to document organizations' self descriptions of why they initiated sustainable development (SD) reporting and explore these explanations using an institutional theory framework.

Design/methodology/approach

Constructs organizational narratives from semi‐structured in‐depth interviews with reporting champions who participated in an SD reporting workshop series. The narratives are analysed using institutional theory to explore how regulatory, normative and cognitive institutions combine with organizational dynamics to influence SD reporting activity.

Findings

For these particular organizations, choosing to engage in reporting appears not to be a rational choice. Rather reporting is initiated because it has come to be an accepted part of pursuing a differentiation strategy, it offers some contribution to existing business challenges, and organizations value the rewards it offers. This rationale constitutes a cognitive mechanism within institutional theory.

Originality/value

The paper provides useful information on initiating sustainable development reporting based on organizations' self descriptions.

Keywords

Citation

Bebbington, J., Higgins, C. and Frame, B. (2009), "Initiating sustainable development reporting: evidence from New Zealand", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 588-625. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570910955452

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles