To read this content please select one of the options below:

Decomposing organisational reputation: The effects of organisation–public relationship outcomes on cognitive representations of organisations and evaluations of organisational performance

Sung‐Un Yang (Assistant Professor in the Department of Public Relations at Syracuse University)
James E. Grunig (Professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Maryland)

Journal of Communication Management

ISSN: 1363-254X

Article publication date: 1 December 2005

Issue publication date: 1 December 2005

3613

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to decompose common reputation measurement systems into behavioural organisation–public relationship outcomes, cognitive representations of an organisation in the minds of publics and evaluations of organisational performance. In the proposed model, propensity for active communication behaviour and familiarity are suggested as correlated precursors of organisation–public relationship outcomes (eg trust, satisfaction, commitment and control mutuality) and organisation–public relationship outcomes are hypothesised to have a direct effect on evaluations of organisational performance as well as an indirect effect via the mediation of cognitive representations of the organisation. The authors investigated different types of five Korean‐based organisations )two domestic corporations in different industries, a multinational corporation, a sports association and a non‐profit organisation) to validate the model across different types of organisations. The findings of this study suggest that relationship outcomes lead to favourable representations of an organisation and positive evaluations of performance of the organisation.

Keywords

Citation

Yang, S. and Grunig, J.E. (2005), "Decomposing organisational reputation: The effects of organisation–public relationship outcomes on cognitive representations of organisations and evaluations of organisational performance", Journal of Communication Management, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 305-325. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540510621623

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles