To read this content please select one of the options below:

Reengineering, crafting and comparing business valuation models – the advisory exemplar

K. Srinivasa Reddy (Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India)
Rajat Agrawal (Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India)
Vinay Kumar Nangia (Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India)

International Journal of Commerce and Management

ISSN: 1056-9219

Article publication date: 30 August 2013

1572

Abstract

Purpose

Does target firm shareholders excessively paid or adequately rewarded or stumpy compensated? To address this query, the study aims to remix valuation parameters for better combination of mixture so that it represents fair deal value in merger and acquisition (M&A) negotiation process. The purpose of the study is to redesign the existing valuation methods, craft new models and compare them to suggest perceptive guidelines for “valuation governance”.

Design/methodology/approach

This research reconstructs discounted cash flows (DCF) and net asset valuations (NAV), originate NRR‐APB approach, MCF‐RS and MCF‐ES and finally compare all seven methods for each select company in the respective industry/sector. Exclusively, estimating the forecasting hurdle rate (FHR) is a core competence of valuation process.

Findings

Among the valuation models, all seven methods for select companies have been reported diverse values, however NRR‐APB approach describe factual enterprise value for bargaining the value of target firm in structuring M&A deals.

Research limitations/implications

Due to petite sample, study has limited scope to validate the proposed conceptual models for valuation governance. Particularly, models have developed under the Indian accounting regulations, standards and reporting mechanism. Though, it can be practiced in other accounting standards on trail and error basis.

Practical implications

Valuation practitioners, governments, consultants, M&A advisory, market research and academia may implement these business valuation techniques, guidelines and implications in particular sector/industry to protect the interest of target firm shareholders and justify the consistent value for acquirer/bidding firm. Accordingly, stakeholders' interest could also be sheltered.

Originality/value

The paper intends to introduce NRR‐APB approach, MCF‐RS and MCF‐ES, reengineering DCF and NAV and compare these valuation methods on three companies each in select two industries, auto ancillary and hotels and resorts. Further, it would be adding a token of contribution to the notable area corporate finance. Hence, this article is the first study to argue on valuation governance and recommend state to enact immediately in India.

Keywords

Citation

Srinivasa Reddy, K., Agrawal, R. and Nangia, V.K. (2013), "Reengineering, crafting and comparing business valuation models – the advisory exemplar", International Journal of Commerce and Management, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 216-241. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCoMA-07-2011-0018

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles