To read this content please select one of the options below:

Pragmatism versus sociological hermeneutics

Critical Theory: Diverse Objects, Diverse Subjects

ISBN: 978-0-76230-963-4, eISBN: 978-1-84950-177-4

Publication date: 10 December 2002

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to open a debate about the relevance of American pragmatism for the philosophy of the social sciences. The agenda for a pragmatist philosophy of social science is introduced by contrasting it with ‘sociological hermeneutics’. Sociological hermeneutics refers to a common research agenda that attempts to implement insights from the philosophical project of hermeneutics into the social sciences. According to this view, the interpretative method is a sine qua non for any faithful representation of the external world. In contrast, a pragmatist philosophy of social sciences shows affinities with Nietzsche's genealogical method and the reflexive turn in cultural anthropology. Its aim is not to represent something out-there, but to use the encounter with different forms of life to reassess our selves and our own culture.

Citation

Baert, P. (2002), "Pragmatism versus sociological hermeneutics", Lehmann, J. (Ed.) Critical Theory: Diverse Objects, Diverse Subjects (Current Perspectives in Social Theory, Vol. 22), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-1204(03)80016-6

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2003, Emerald Group Publishing Limited