POSTMODERNISM VERSUS TRUTH IN MANAGEMENT THEORY

Abstract

Organizational researchers live in two worlds. The first demands and rewards speculations about how to improve performance. The second demands and rewards adherence to rigorous standards of scholarship (March & Sutton, 1997, p. 698).Those of us who study organizations and are professors of management work on the front lines, so to speak, where the beliefs we have about how to improve managerial performance get passed directly on to practitioners. The question is, What right do we have to put our beliefs in a privileged position? Beliefs, by definition, are supposed to be true. According to Webster’s (1996) a belief is a conviction about the truth of some statement and/or reality of some phenomenon, especially when based on examination of evidence. Are all of our lectures based on consensually agreed upon evidentiary standards? What are these standards and who should maintain them?

Citation

McKelvey, B. (2003), "POSTMODERNISM VERSUS TRUTH IN MANAGEMENT THEORY", Locke, E.A. (Ed.) Post Modernism and Management (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 21), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 113-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-558X(03)21005-3