Fashion: Why People Like it and Theorists do not

Abstract

One of the many paradoxes of fashions is that consumers’ choices change rapidly and with an astonishing degree of synchronization. What is successful or socially acceptable in one period is considered the opposite in the next. This paradox has brought economists and other social scientists to conceive of fashions and fads as one of many forms of irrational behavior. Herd behavior and weakness of will, a desire to conform or, conversely, to distinguish oneself, have all been invoked to explain the rapid evolution of modes of behavior that emerge and more or less suddenly disappear. In this paper we try to show that fashions, even if fragile and transient, might nonetheless be rational. It is a rationality, however, that has to include something overlooked in most economic writing: the desire for novelty and variety. In fashions this desire takes the form of coordinated behavior that both facilitates consumption and destroys its novel content, thus paving the way for new fashions to appear.

Citation

Andreozzi, L. and Bianchi, M. (2007), "Fashion: Why People Like it and Theorists do not", Bianchi, M. (Ed.) The Evolution of Consumption: Theories and Practices (Advances in Austrian Economics, Vol. 10), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 209-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1529-2134(07)10009-0